The Image of GOD

Genesis 1:26-27 Then God said, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness;

Genesis 1:26-27 Then God said, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth." 27 So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.


Theological textbooks talk about the “Imago Dei,” Latin for the “Image of God.” That phrase comes from the creation story, right there in Genesis 1.27. God’s people have been trying to define the image for centuries.


A common way of describing the image of God is to consider what distinguishes human beings from other creatures. The list often includes language, intelligence, emotions, imagination, the ability to reason, love, and problem-solve. The Imago Dei means to have a capacity for relationship and care that no other created thing has. The problem with lists like this is the more we study flora and fauna, the more we discover that other creatures share some of these characteristics. For example, albatross mate for life and constantly diversify their relationship rituals. Crows invent tools and recognize human faces. Elephants truly have an exceptional memory, are self-aware, collaborate, and engage in play. Chimps display a wide range of emotions and can be taught sign language to communicate with humans. If having emotion, problem-solving and intelligence are signs of the Imago Dei, then we are not the only creatures to display those traits.


Look again at the Genesis text. First, the image of God says we are made according to God’s likeness (Genesis 1.26). So often we confuse this and think it means God looks like us. Hence the white, bearded man is everywhere from the Sistine Chapel to magazines and billboards. The truth is we look like God. And not just one of us but all of us, male and female. If I want to get a glimpse of the divine, I should look at humans. Sadly, when we say we want to experience God`s presence, we look to nature, or we retreat to the mountains, the beach, or the woods. We want to get away from people when people are the truest reflection of God. Of all the things that the Lord God created, only humanity carries God's image. Second, the Imago Dei is connected with dominion, ownership, and in our case, stewardship. In ancient times, persons would mark their possessions with a seal, carrying their symbol or image (like a brand). If human beings carry the image of God, we are the physical image, the brand of God, that shows God’s ownership. Humans are not the owners, we are the reflection of the owner, the Creator. We misinterpret our charge to have dominion if we think it is a command to plunder the planet. We are not owners! Human beings are charged to care for the planet as stewards. Adam and Eve’s first task was to tend the garden (Genesis 2.15), not exploit it.


The Image of God says we see the Divine when we see each other. Can we learn to be inspired, humbled, and uplifted by the sight of one another? Can we appreciate one another, even embrace one another, on the grounds of our sharing the image? The Imago Dei says we are stewards of God’s creation. Can we learn to live and move with the planet instead of bowing it to our limited knowledge? Can we be thankful for the bounty God has provided and work for all to share in it? That is what the other “intelligent” creatures do.


White Rock Baptist Church

The Other Side

By Rev. Steven B. Lawrence • 06 Jul, 2022
[Jesus] said to them, "Cast the net to the right side of the boat, and you will find some." So they cast it, and now they were not able to haul it in because there were so many fish . John 21.4-7

Faith and Works

08 Sep, 2021
One of the most ancient theological discussions for Christians is that of "Faith" and "Works." There is a bit of a misunderstanding in this discussion. There are two types of "works" to consider. When Paul refers to "works" he is referring to the practices of the faith that involve our rituals. For Paul that meant the practices of circumcision, diet, and the observance of holy days. Paul came to understand that these things were expressions of faith but they did not earn salvation or convey righteousness. Paul noted that his ancestors Abraham and Sarah gained God's favor through their trust, their confidence, in God (see Genesis 12.4; 15.6), and they had faith before their obedient actions. Faith lead to action. The Book of James continues and extends the discussion by asking, "If there is no appropriate action, is there faith? If I see someone who is ill fed or ill clothed and I say to him or her, "Be full and warm," that is not the appropriate action that shows my faith in Jesus. Jesus had compassion for those in need; I should imitate Jesus to show my faith. Now, let's push it a step further. What if I say I am a Christian and my behavior is not just inappropriate but harmful, even hateful. If right action affirms my Christian faith, doesn't wrong action, hurtful action, contradict it? Perhaps the modern Christian conversation is not about "faith" and "works" but about "talkers" and "doers." Perhaps the current debate is about how some can identify themselves as Christian yet be vengeful, not forgiving; intolerant, not understanding. Can I say I follow Jesus and yet be selfish, not generous or arrogant, and not humble. James said, "My talk is not proof of my faith, my deeds are." What do we say?  Rev. Steven B. Lawrence
A True Friend Intervenes

A True Friend Intervenes

08 Sep, 2021
Read: First Samuel 19.1-7; 23.1-18; Second Samuel 9 Jonathan spoke well of David to his father Saul, saying to him, “The king should not sin against his servant David, because he has not sinned against you, and because his deeds have been of good service to you; for he took his life in his hand when he attacked the Philistine, and the LORD brought about a great victory for all Israel” First Samuel 19.4-5a (NRSV) The theme of this month’s lessons is “Inclusive Love.” We begin by looking at one of the greatest friendships in the Bible, that of Jonathan and David. After David defeated Goliath, Saul made him a part of his forces. Soon his prowess as a soldier and the victories the Lord granted him caused the women to sing, Saul has killed his thousands, and David his ten thousands (First Samuel 18.7). Saul became angry and jealous; soon the Spirit of the Lord had departed from him and an evil spirit took over. Saul personally tried to kill David twice and secretly plotted to have him killed in battle but the Lord was with him (18.12, 28). Finally, Saul spoke to his servants and his own son, Jonathan, about killing David. Was he aware that Jonathan and David were best friends? Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that he was wearing, and gave it to David, and his armor, and even his sword and his bow and his belt (18.3-4). Jonathan took it upon himself to be the mediator between his father and his friend. He warned David to keep out of Saul’s sight and he reasoned with his father. He reminded him of David’s bravery, his loyal service and his innocence (19.4-5). Saul heeded the voice of Jonathan; Saul swore, “As the LORD lives, [David] shall not be put to death” (v.6). Jonathan was an exemplary person and a strong friend. Consider: as the heir apparent, David was as much a threat to Jonathan as to Saul, yet, instead of killing him, Jonathan befriended him, equipped him for battle, warned him of danger and interceded for him with the king. Jonathan directly disobeyed the order to kill David; he knew it was unjust and unwarranted. A true friend does more than just hope things will get better; a true friend intervenes. Reverend Steven B. Lawrence

Growing Our Faith

08 Sep, 2021
He said, "Come." So Peter got out of the boat, started walking on the water, and came toward Jesus. But when he noticed the strong wind, he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, “Lord, save me!” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, “You of little faith, why did you doubt?” Matthew 14.29-31 (NRSV) Matthew, Mark, and Luke each have record Jesus calming the storm (see the lesson for June 13). Only Matthew has this story of Jesus, and Peter, walking on the water. The Gospel of Matthew often features Peter as the model disciple, not because he is perfect but because his example is so teachable whether he does well or fairs poorly. Since we have already seen Jesus calm a storm (Matthew 8.26), in this lesson we can focus on Peter. We can say that Peter showed faith when he walked on water toward Jesus. But, we should also remember Peter’s bold, outspoken personality (Matthew 26.33). It fit his character to launch out before the other disciples as well as to become terrified and sink when he saw the high winds (8.30). Fortunately, when he cried out for help, Jesus was there to rescue him. There is some scolding in Jesus’ words, You of little faith, why did you doubt? (v. 31). The Greek word for doubt is “distazo.” It is not a thinking word, like “skeptical” or “cynical.” It is a physical word; it means “to hesitate,” “to vacillate,” “to be pulled in two directions.” It is what Elijah said to the people on Mount Carmel trying to worship Baal and Yahweh, How long halt ye between two opinions? (First Kings 18.21). Peter is not undecided, he is dually engaged, limping between his bold statement of faith and his actual condition of faith—he has overestimated one and underestimated the other. He believes, but not enough. He has “little faith.” On our faith journeys, we all begin with “little faith.” Faith does not grow because we become braver. Faith increases as we learn to trust God. Confidence comes with experience. Our experiences with God can grow a faith, “that shines more bright and clear when tempests rage without; that when in danger, knows no fear, in darkness, feels no doubt.” Reverend Steven B. Lawrence
Share by: